Wednesday, February 4, 2009
Consequences of Deviating From Plan
I am trying to focus on gains in the very short term. Last Wednesday I bought SKF which shorts financial services stocks. Late yesterday my 100 shares were up around $1,800. Had I been sticking to plan I would have sold and taken the profit. But I thought it would go up further in the short term and didn't sell. When that didn't appear to be happening this morning I sold at a profit of $811.12 (6.1% return in 5 trading days). Had I not deviated from my plan I would have done a lot better. However, I am focusing on being grateful for the profit I made and trying not to dwell on the higher profit that got away.
Wednesday, January 28, 2009
Sobering
This assessment in today's Financial Times by Luke Johnson, who runs Risk Capital Partners in the UK, is quite sobering:
Prepare for a wrenching, unstoppable redistribution of wealth – and I am not talking about domestic taxes. For too long it has been more profitable in the west to finance consumption rather than production. That cannot continue. I am afraid that the west’s credibility – and luck – has run out.
This vast reordering of our economic system has only just begun. We shall have to cancel all the self-indulgence of endless welfare spending and cultivate rather more of a work ethic and a sense of self-sufficiency. Expectations must be modified and attitudes altered profoundly. Expect years of negligible growth, permanent high unemployment, declining property prices, higher taxes, crumbling currencies and falling living standards.
Prepare for a wrenching, unstoppable redistribution of wealth – and I am not talking about domestic taxes. For too long it has been more profitable in the west to finance consumption rather than production. That cannot continue. I am afraid that the west’s credibility – and luck – has run out.
This vast reordering of our economic system has only just begun. We shall have to cancel all the self-indulgence of endless welfare spending and cultivate rather more of a work ethic and a sense of self-sufficiency. Expectations must be modified and attitudes altered profoundly. Expect years of negligible growth, permanent high unemployment, declining property prices, higher taxes, crumbling currencies and falling living standards.
Saturday, January 24, 2009
The Long and the Short of It (by John Kay)
Here is the first sentence of the review of John Kay's book by Stephanie Flanders, who is the BBC's economics editor:
"John Kay thinks the modern financial world is greedy, cynical and self-interested, and that we should all shun the professionals and manage our investments for ourselves."
And a few paragraphs later on:
"One word of warning: if you have any investments managed by somebody else – and like it or not, almost anyone with a pension does – this is not going to be a comfortable read. Kay’s point is not that professional investment managers are naturally wicked or corrupt, although, of course, some are. It is that inevitably, by the nature of their business, these people will rarely have your best interests at heart.
For starters, in order to remain professionals, investment managers need to make money out of your investments, regardless of whether they go up or down. You do not. If you manage them yourself, “your bonus is already in your pocket”. The regular FT reader is probably already scandalised by the scale of commissions and management fees in the retail investment industry, never more than when these percentages come on top of the double-digit losses that most investors will have suffered in 2008. But you are probably still not scandalised enough."
My sentiments exactly. John Kay writes an excellent personal finance column in The Financial Times, from which much of the material in the book was adapted.
Here is the url of the book review:
ft.com/cms/s/2/4bf99cdc-e35b-11dd-a5cf-0000779fd2ac.html
"John Kay thinks the modern financial world is greedy, cynical and self-interested, and that we should all shun the professionals and manage our investments for ourselves."
And a few paragraphs later on:
"One word of warning: if you have any investments managed by somebody else – and like it or not, almost anyone with a pension does – this is not going to be a comfortable read. Kay’s point is not that professional investment managers are naturally wicked or corrupt, although, of course, some are. It is that inevitably, by the nature of their business, these people will rarely have your best interests at heart.
For starters, in order to remain professionals, investment managers need to make money out of your investments, regardless of whether they go up or down. You do not. If you manage them yourself, “your bonus is already in your pocket”. The regular FT reader is probably already scandalised by the scale of commissions and management fees in the retail investment industry, never more than when these percentages come on top of the double-digit losses that most investors will have suffered in 2008. But you are probably still not scandalised enough."
My sentiments exactly. John Kay writes an excellent personal finance column in The Financial Times, from which much of the material in the book was adapted.
Here is the url of the book review:
ft.com/cms/s/2/4bf99cdc-e35b-11dd-a5cf-0000779fd2ac.html
Tuesday, January 20, 2009
What I Love About The Stock Market
The unpredictability of market can breathtaking. Today, instead of an "Obama rally" there is widespread panic in the early going. At 10:45 a.m. the S&P 500 is down 21.84, or about 2.5%. I have no idea whether this sell-off will reverse itself as the day proceeds or whether this level of loss will either be sustained or accelerated.
Sunday, January 18, 2009
Contradiction
You may wonder whether there is there a contradiction between Monday's posting in which I humorously trashed Citigroup and Friday's posting in which I revealed I had bought Citigroup stock. That is a fair question to ask. The answer is that I was trading on the momentum of Citigroup stock rather than using the stock as an investment vehicle. I'm okay holding onto the stock of a debauched corporation like Citigroup for several hours or even several days, but it's not a candidate for the old "buy and hold" strategy.
Saturday, January 17, 2009
No Obama Rally on Friday
The S&P 500 went up slightly in the last two hours of the trading day (roughly 6 points, or 0.8%). This could hardly be termed a rally. I sold off the 400 shares of JPM Chase I'd bought earlier in the day at a small profit (about $175), and held on to the 300 shares of Citicorp which are down about $60 from what I paid for them. Maybe there will be an Obama rally on Tuesday when he actually becomes the president....
Overall, last week was the best trading week I've had since November. I finished the week up about $2,950.
It's hard to tell what changed in me and what changed in the external environment from what obtained during the slump period that lasted for the entire month of December, during which time I spent days at a time not being able to figure out anything to trade that I thought stood a reasonable chance of making money.
Overall, last week was the best trading week I've had since November. I finished the week up about $2,950.
It's hard to tell what changed in me and what changed in the external environment from what obtained during the slump period that lasted for the entire month of December, during which time I spent days at a time not being able to figure out anything to trade that I thought stood a reasonable chance of making money.
Friday, January 16, 2009
Obama Rally?
Will an "Obama Rally" start this afternoon? I bought 300 shares of Citigroup (C) and 400 shares of JP Morgan Chase (JPM) at beaten down prices earlier today with the expectation that the trading day is more likely to end on an up than a down note. We'll see what happens. At 2:03 p.m. the S&P 500 was essentially flat (down 0.73 points, or about 1/10th %). We'll see what happens within the next two hours....
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)